IS IT WORTH READING K. MARX AND HOW TO READ IT?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31618/nas.2413-5291.2021.1.70.467Keywords:
labor; cost; productive force; labor productivity; items of consumption; income; means of labor; main capital;Abstract
On the Internet respectable economists are debating on the topic "False theses of Marxism: the tendency of the rate of profit to fall". Dozens of economists are involved in these debates. Some believe that K. Marx is right, others believe that he is wrong. At the same time, the disputants reveal negligence in relation to each other, a complete misunderstanding of the text of "CAPITAL", but they also admit accusations against K. Marx, such as: "his understanding of the meaning of the concept of" constant capital "was amateurish", or "the mechanism of "surplus time" was invented and the appropriation of workers' labor in this mythical "surplus time", and so on, etc. We cannot agree with such an attitude towards K. Marx, who left us (humanity!) An invaluable ideological legacy, manuscripts not fully published during his lifetime under the general title "CAPITAL".
References
Andropov Yu. Uchenie Karla Marksa i nekotorye voprosy socialisticheskogo stroitelstva v SSSR // Kommunist. – 1983. – № 3.
Belova S. V. Fond vozmesheniya sredstv truda i dinamika 1 podrazdeleniya M.: 1977.
Dva podrazdeleniya obshestvennogo proizvodstva, (metodologiya deleniya) /Pod red. Zalkinda L. I. – M.: Statistika, 1976.
Dva podrazdeleniya obshestvennogo proizvodstva // Pod red. Cherkovca V.N. – M.: Mysl, 1971.
Kulik V.I, Kulik I.V. Proizvoditelnaya sila i proizvoditelnost truda. Nauka v cifrah. – 2017. – № 4 (5) – S. 18-36. (46 s.).
Kulik V.I., Kulik I.V. O dvizhenii produkta i ego stoimosti, o sostavnyh chastyah stoimosti lyubogo tovarnogo produkta // Vestnik HGAEP. 2003. № 4.
Kulik V.I, Kulik I.V. Struktura rabochego dnya, produkta, stoimosti produkta: ekonomicheskij i socialno-politicheskij aspekty //Vestnik HGAEP. 2006. № 6.
Kulik V., Kulik I. Stoit li perechityvat Marksa i kak ego chitat? Ekonomicheskaya teoriya: prognozy i realnost // Vestnik HGAEP.
№ 4. 9. Kulik V. I. Struktura rabochego dnya: socialno-politicheskij, ekonomicheskij i tehnicheskij aspekty. //Vestnik HGAEP. 2002. № 2. 10. Kulik V. I., Kulik I. V. Materialnoe proizvodstvo – osnova socialnoj formy dvizheniya. //Vestnik HGAEP. 2001. № 2.
Lenin V.I. 1971. Poln. Sobr. Soch. T.4.
Marks K. Soch. – 2-e izd./ K. Marks, F. Engels. – T. 24.
Marks K. Soch. – 2-e izd./ K. Marks, F. Engels. – T. 23.
Marks K. Soch. – 2-e izd./ K. Marks, F. Engels. – T. 4. Ch. III.
Marks K. Soch. – 2-e izd./ K. Marks, F. Engels. – T. 16.
Marks K. Kapital. T.1. – M.: Gos. izd-vo. lit., 1949.
Marks K. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857-1861 gg., ch. 1, 2, 3. – M.: Izd-vo. polit. lit., 1978.
Marks K. T. 4, ch.1, ch.2, ch.3. – (Teorii pribavochnoj stoimosti). – M.: Izd-vo polit. lit., 1978.
Marks K., Engels F. // Soch. 2-e izd. T. 47.
Marks K., Engels F. // Soch. 2-e izd. T. 20.
Marks K. Kapital. T.3, ch.1, ch.2 – M.: Izdvo. polit. lit., 1978.
Marks K. Soch. – 2-e izd. / K.Marks, F. Engels. – T. 6.
Marks K. Kapital. T.2. – M.: Izd-vo. Polit. lit.,1978.
Pushkin A.S. Evgenij Onegin; [Boris Godunov; Malenkie tragedii] / Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin. – Moskva : Izdatelstvo AST, 2015. – 352 s. – (Eksklyuziv: Russkaya klassika).
Shaumyan G.A. Kompleksnaya avtomatizaciya proizvodstvennyh processov. M. : Mashinostroenie, 1973.
Shumpeter J. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya / Per. c nem. – M.: Progress, 1978.
Ekonomicheskij zakon neuklonnogo rosta proizvoditelnosti truda: sushnost, dejstvie i ispolzovanie / Redakcionnaya kollegiya: I.I. Kuzminov i dr., M.: «Mysl», 1974.
Engels F. Karl Marks. – M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.
