GENDER IMBALANCE AMONG DONORS IN LIVING KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: THE KAZAKHSTAN EXPERIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31618/nas.2413-5291.2021.5.74.548Keywords:
gender; imbalance, donor, recipient, interaction, transplantation, women, menAbstract
This article examines the roles of men and women in living-organ kidney transplantation and provides indepth analysis of an issue by considering alternative perspectives. The main purpose of an article is to identify the roles of women and men during donor-recipient interactions in living-organ kidney transplantation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The article is based on the theories of Alice Eagle about ‘culture and biology interconnection mechanism’ and Sylvia Walby about the ‘Patriarchy system’. In terms of resources, statistical data from RSE on PCV "Republican center for coordination of transplantation and high-tech medical services" of the Ministry of health Of the Republic of Kazakhstan, database of the Ministry of Digital Development, Innovations and Aerospace Industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and data related to the donors and recipients from Hospital №7 in Almaty between 2012 and 2016 have been used. The paper considers the importance of gender equality in living-organ kidney transplantation and presents the possible ways of reslving a problem.
References
The database of the Ministry of Digital Development, Innovations, and Aerospace Industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2021)
https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/mdai?lang=ru
The statistical information about donorrecipient interaction between 2012-2016 provided by the database of the Hospital №7 in Almaty
Social Psychology; David Mayer (2006)
https://socioline.ru/book/devid-majerssotsialnaya-psihologiya
Theory of patriarchy; Sylvia Walby (1989)
https://studme.org/107460/sotsiologiya/gendernoe_neravenstvo
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.