PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE: MODERN ASPECTS

Authors

  • A. Serebrennikova Lomonosov Moscow State University

Keywords:

conceptual analysis, disease, philosophy of medicine, health

Abstract

The article discusses the current trends in the development of modern philosophy of medicine as an independent branch of philosophical knowledge. By the example of the limited potential of using the methodology of conceptual analysis in the context of academic debates between naturalists and normativists in the modern analytical philosophy of medicine, the importance and necessity of expanding the practice of applying methods of experimental science is emphasized.

References

Boorse C. A rebuttal on health. In What is disease? Totowa: Humana Press, 1997. 134p.

Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept // Philosophy of Science. 1977. №44. P. 542-573.

Lemoine M. Defining disease beyond conceptual analysis: An analysis of conceptual analysis in philosophy of medicine // Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2013. №34. P. 309-352.

Matthewson J. and Griffiths P. Biological criteria of disease: Four ways of going wrong // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2017. №42. P. 447-466.

Neander K. Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense // Philosophy of Science. 1991. №58. P. 168-184.

Wakefield J. The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values // American Psychologist. 1992. №47. P. 373-388.

Published

2022-06-24

Issue

Section

Статьи